 |
Fire Investigation INFOCUS podcastAuthor: Scott Kuhlman and Chasity Owens
Welcome to the Fire Investigation INFOCUS podcast, where we dive deep into the fascinating world of origin and cause investigations. Join hosts Scott Kuhlman and Chasity Owens, experienced fire investigators, as they discuss all things fire investigation from the latest techniques, case studies, and challenges faced by professionals in this critical field. Through a community effort, this podcast aims to create a platform for investigators to learn from one another and grow together. Whether you're a seasoned investigator, a first responder, or simply curious about the science behind fire investigations, this bi-weekly podcast will provide valuable insights, expert interviews, and practical tips to enhance your knowledge and skills. Tune in to stay up-to-date on the latest developments in fire investigation and join the conversation. Language: en-us Genres: Education, How To, True Crime Contact email: Get it Feed URL: Get it iTunes ID: Get it |
Listen Now...
S.3 Ep.1- New Year Refresh; Site Safety Assessments
Episode 1
Wednesday, 7 January, 2026
Send us a textSeason 3 kicks off with a timely and critical conversation on site safety assessments and why they are more than just a procedural checkbox—they’re a fundamental part of the fire investigation process. Scott Kuhlman and Chasity Owens open the new year by reflecting on recent cases, near-misses, and real-world examples that highlight how quickly an investigation can become dangerous when scene hazards aren’t properly assessed, mitigated, and documented. From energized electrical systems in fire-damaged structures to compromised floors, structural instability, soot exposure, and unauthorized occupants, this episode underscores that investigators must actively verify scene safety rather than rely on assumptions or third-party assurances.The discussion dives into what governing documents actually require, breaking down how NFPA 921, NFPA 1033, and NFPA 1321 address site safety assessments and why the word “shall” matters—especially in court. Scott and Chasity explain how failing to document a safety assessment in your report becomes low-hanging fruit for attorneys, even when the assessment was performed. They also explore the differences between public and private scene control, how safety officers and incident command influence access, and why investigators must continually reassess hazards as conditions change. The episode closes with training opportunities related to investigator safety, a practical explanation of what a white paper is (and how it differs from a technical report), and a challenge for listeners to define SOPs—and distinguish them from SOGs—before the next episode.Trainings & Conferences MentionedFire Investigation Safety Officer TrainingMesa, Arizona — February 9–10, 2026New Hampton, New York — February 11–12, 2026(Future offerings also mentioned in Illinois, April–May 2026; exact dates TBD)Kansas IAAI Annual ConferenceWichita — February 3–5, 2026New Mexico IAAI Annual Training ConferenceAlbuquerque — February 23–27, 2026California Conference of Arson Investigators (CCAI) TrainingCalifornia — February 23–26, 2026Scott and Chasity will be teaching at this conferenceGeorgia Fire Investigators Association – Spring ConferenceMarietta — March 16–19, 2026(Held at Cobb County location)Scientific Advisory Work Group (SAW Group) – Mock Report ChallengeOregon — January 2026Exact dates not specified during the episodeThank you for listening! If you enjoyed the episode, give us 5 stars, hit the follow button, and subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and anywhere you are listening in from. Follow us on social media!Instagram: @infocusfire_podcastLinkedIn: INFOCUS podcastFacebook: INFOCUS podcastTikTok: @infocus_podcast
