 |
Egberto Off The RecordPodcasts for Egberto Off The Record Author: Fact-Based Political News & Opinion
Live versions of my Politics Done Right media/radio show. Included are Egberto Off The Record Substack lives with other Substackers. We also include some interviews from the media/radio show with politicians, activists, and engaged citizens. And of course, you get some of my Off-The-Record commentary. egberto.substack.com Language: en Genres: News, News Commentary Contact email: Get it Feed URL: Get it iTunes ID: Get it |
Listen Now...
LIVE! AI Billionaires Pass Risk; Paxton Blames Trump for Poll Slide; Why Vote in Person?
Thursday, 1 October, 2026
Thank you Farmers AGAINST trump., RLM, Leilani, Ginger, CicifromCincy, and many others for tuning into my live video!* AI Billionaires Want the Profits. Working People Get the Risk: AI billionaires claim the rewards while communities shoulder the risks. A progressive case for corporate accountability, public oversight, and protection from data center costs.* Paxton blames president for his decline in the polls* Voters pivoting to in person votingReal Time Chat AnalysisThe October 1, 2026, 3:00 PM CT Politics Done Right chats showed an engaged audience turning political frustration into organizing, mutual encouragement, and demands for accountability. The dominant sentiment combined anger toward concentrated wealth and Trump-aligned politics with determination to vote and help others participate. Substack functioned primarily as a supportive community conversation, while the Facebook-labeled Restream feed featured more links, policy disputes, and challenges to the program’s progressive perspective.* Voting and grassroots organizing provided the strongest shared focus. [Lori] described knocking on doors for Angie Nixon and planning another canvassing outing. Her report that most independents and unaffiliated voters she encountered leaned Democratic encouraged the group, although she explicitly noted that the neighborhood was not a MAGA stronghold. [SkyBlueEyes] described helping Eileen Laubacher’s campaign against Lauren Boebert, while [Vegan Cindy] discussed weekly bridge demonstrations and signs promoting participation. [Cheryl 🦅] reminded viewers to check their registration. In the Restream feed, [@patrickmagner3758] urged early voting, and [@charlenef.9055] emphasized voting early or by mail and refusing intimidation. The conversation supported participation through multiple methods; it did not establish a collective pivot away from mail voting.* AI discussion centered on corporate power, public costs, and distrust of billionaire mythology. [Leilani] raised concerns about water and the public investment behind private technology fortunes. [SkyBlueEyes] and [RLM] sharply rejected the idea that technology executives alone deserve credit for innovation. [@charlenef.9055] emphasized human inputs, flawed information, and shortcomings that emerge when companies release products to the public. [Paul Fleming] supplied posts alleging problems involving AI political spending, taxation, regulation, and financial conflicts. [@Laketravisanyone] challenged the discussion by asking whether it amounted to an AI scare and whether profits could finance research. The prevailing sentiment demanded accountability, with some disagreement over how to interpret corporate incentives and technological risk.* The farmer’s participation drew empathy and interest in rural political change. Comments surrounding [Farmers AGAINST trump.], who identified herself as Ann, prompted concern about farming conditions, family livelihoods, immigration enforcement, and rural discontent. [Lynette], [SkyBlueEyes], and [Leilani] offered encouragement and welcomed the possibility that neighbors might consider different political choices. [Farmers AGAINST trump.] also described anger among oil-field workers. These exchanges suggested an audience eager to connect progressive economic arguments with rural experiences. Because the attachment contains chat reactions rather than a complete call transcript, it does not establish every detail of the caller’s account.* The Restream discussion contained sharper political disagreement. [Erik Hz] introduced property-tax complaints, criticism of the Travis County district attorney, and challenges to Talarico’s political positioning and financial support, ending with the assertion that both parties lie. [@Laketravisanyone] mixed encouragement to vote with dismissive or challenging responses. Meanwhile, [@AgolfTwittler] criticized authoritarian politics and alleged connections between Paxton’s donors and policy positions; [@patrickmagner3758] criticized Texas MAGA leadership. [e2247] and [Paul Fleming] served as frequent information suppliers, while [May Wood] questioned the implications of shared stories. These posts reveal commenters’ concerns and viewpoints; their linked allegations are not independently verified by the chat itself.* Community warmth and humor sustained engagement. [Lynette] welcomed arrivals, celebrated volunteers, encouraged organizing, and promoted the next book-club selection. [SkyBlueEyes] explicitly described friendships formed without meeting in person. Jokes about AI preparing dinner, family updates, and concern for absent regulars softened an otherwise intense discussion. [Tom Czarnik] contributed an extended political song parody and later praised its delivery. [Leilani] celebrated poetry and creativity. These moments showed that the audience values fellowship and cultural expression alongside political analysis.Overall, the chats conveyed anger without resignation, anxiety accompanied by action, and strong affection for the program’s community. The clearest audience response favored practical organizing and a politics that puts working people ahead of wealthy interests. This is a qualitative assessment of participating commenters, not a representative measure of all viewers; frequent contributors shaped much of the visible conversation.Real Time Chat AnalysisThis post has bonus content for paid subscribers. Upgrade to get full access.[WP-ROUTING]Site: PoliticsDoneRight.comCategory: Coffee Party ShowsPubDate: 2026-10-01T15:00:00Tags: Politics Done Right, AI billionaires, artificial intelligence, corporate accountability, public oversight, data centers, electricity costs, ratepayer protection, working families, economic justice, Ken Paxton, Donald Trump, James Talarico, Texas Senate race, Texas politics, 2026 midterm elections, in-person voting, early voting, voter registration, voting rights, democracy, progressive politics This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit egberto.substack.com/subscribe
