 |
Egberto Off The RecordPodcasts for Egberto Off The Record Author: Fact-Based Political News & Opinion
Live versions of my Politics Done Right media/radio show. Included are Egberto Off The Record Substack lives with other Substackers. We also include some interviews from the media/radio show with politicians, activists, and engaged citizens. And of course, you get some of my Off-The-Record commentary. egberto.substack.com Language: en Genres: News, News Commentary Contact email: Get it Feed URL: Get it iTunes ID: Get it |
Listen Now...
LIVE! How Progressives Can Reconnect With Rural Voters and Build Lasting Working-Class Power
Friday, 9 October, 2026
Thank you Under the Golden Boot, RLM, RuleofLawRules, SkyBlueEyes, Lori, and many others for tuning into my live video! * Ep. 0006: How Progressives Can Reconnect With Rural Voters and Build Lasting Working-Class Power: Erica Etelson, Anthony Flaccavento and Jared Abbott explore how kitchen-table economics, rural investment and grassroots organizing can bridge political divides and build power for working people. [More]* Abolish ICE,’ Say Potential 2028 Candidates AOC and Khanna After Latest Shooting in NYC: “No child should have to sit and watch while masked officers open fire on his father.” [More]Politics Done Right Program/Chat AnalysisOctober 9, 2026 — 3:00 PM CT streaming programProgram summaryThe broadcast centered on a fundamental progressive challenge: turning widespread economic frustration into lasting working-class power. Through a featured Liberty and Justice For All discussion, Erica Etelson, Anthony Flaccavento, Jared Abbott, and Michael Merrill examined how progressives can reconnect with rural communities, overcome partisan distrust, and build organizations capable of changing people’s material circumstances. The conversation consistently pushed beyond winning elections toward a more demanding objective: giving working people greater control over their livelihoods and government.The opening explained the origins of Liberty and Justice For All and its role alongside Politics Done Right. The host described a collaborative educational project that brings labor history, economic analysis, and organizing experience into sustained discussions. That introduction established the broadcast’s purpose: learning should equip people to act.Five themes drove the discussion:* Kitchen-table economics can break through partisan barriers. Etelson and Abbott described research testing messages about living costs, wages, corporate responsibility, and corruption. They reported that their strongest “American way” message performed well across several voter groups, including a positive response among Republicans despite its Democratic identification. Abbott also described separate research finding a penalty attached to the Democratic label when researchers held the economic message constant.* Credibility requires delivery. Flaccavento argued that rural distrust reflects decades of economic extraction, disinvestment, offshoring, and consolidation. His Rural New Deal discussion paired investment with changes to economic rules. Examples included farmers’ right to repair their equipment, stronger protections against powerful agricultural processors, renewed antitrust enforcement, and confronting private equity’s reach into housing and healthcare.* Messaging research cannot substitute for political education. The host challenged the practice of adapting to opinions that organized misinformation has already shaped. Medicare for All illustrated the tension: should advocates avoid a label because it triggers partisan resistance, or explain the policy forcefully enough to overcome that resistance? The exchange pressed researchers and organizers to distinguish measuring existing attitudes from changing public understanding.* Local action can rebuild trust and collective confidence. Flaccavento described RUBI’s Community Works initiative, through which local Democrats cooperate with civic, religious, and veterans’ organizations on practical projects. Etelson highlighted organizing around hospitals, data centers, and transportation. These examples showed how people can work together around tangible needs before agreeing on national politics.* Workers need an organized counterweight to concentrated wealth. Merrill repeatedly challenged the assumption that improved campaign language would produce structural change. He advocated a political labor movement and an economy that prioritizes workers’ incomes and bargaining power. Abbott emphasized complementary approaches: electoral campaigns, grassroots organizations, stronger unions, ballot initiatives, and independent candidacies.The discussion’s most productive tension involved the relationship between immediate organizing and systemic transformation. Participants largely agreed on the need for bold economic change, but they approached the route differently. Some emphasized persuasion and local credibility; Merrill emphasized a movement powerful enough to confront donor influence and corporate control. The host pressed the panel to address the economic system’s underlying incentives instead of continually treating its symptoms.The closing crystallized the program’s argument: workers need both resources and the power to refuse bad deals. Economic security depends on their ability to exercise meaningful power.Although the earlier promotional package included ICE and abolition demands, the supplied transcript contains no substantive segment on that topic. This summary reflects the broadcast as transcribed.Chat sentimentThe visible Facebook discussion combined anger at political and economic conditions, concern about democratic accountability, and impatience for practical action. Its negative tone targeted political institutions and public officials; it did not primarily express dissatisfaction with the program.The supplied Substack section contains no messages. The Facebook capture also includes navigation text and unrelated posts, which do not represent comments on this broadcast. Among the visible audience contributions, [Paul Fleming] overwhelmingly dominates the substantive discussion, so the record supports a qualitative assessment rather than a representative measure of the full audience.[Paul Fleming] supplied a running stream of political news, allegations, and commentary concerning voter-roll disputes, election-denial activity, public executions, Texas education, government spending, foreign business interests, and household financial pressure. These contributions convey alarm about authoritarianism, anger at perceived corruption, and frustration with economic insecurity. His posts about grocery prices, missed payments, and consumer sentiment connect most directly with the program’s kitchen-table focus.His clearest response to the discussion was: “These discussions must lead to actions. Who’s gonna take the lead?” That comment captures the chat’s strongest connection to the panel’s central debate. It expresses an appetite for leadership, organization, and concrete next steps. His “Amen” suggests agreement with something in the broadcast, although the capture provides no timestamp that identifies the precise statement.[Lee Grant] opened with a friendly greeting and asked where Talarico was. The question signals interest in electoral politics, but its brevity does not establish approval, criticism, or a position on the panel’s arguments.[May Wood] offered a welcoming afternoon greeting. That contribution supports a friendly community atmosphere but provides insufficient evidence for an ideological or substantive judgment.No sustained argument between commenters appears in the supplied record. Nor does the chat establish broad agreement with every panelist. It shows one especially active contributor, brief social participation from others, and a clear demand to connect analysis with action. Several shared posts contain sweeping historical claims, statistics, or allegations; they reveal the commenter’s concerns but should not become verified program findings without separate checking.The program offered a framework for building working-class power. The clearest audience response asked who would organize the next step. A follow-up centered on one specific local campaign, an accountable organizer, and an immediate participation opportunity would directly answer that challenge.Politics Done Right Program/Chat AnalysisThis post has bonus content for paid subscribers. Upgrade to get full access.[WP-ROUTING]Site: PoliticsDoneRight.comCategory: Coffee Party ShowsPubDate: 2026-10-09T15:00:00Tags: Politics Done Right, Liberty and Justice For All, Rural Voters, Rural Organizing, Working-Class Power, Working-Class Solidarity, Progressive Politics, Erica Etelson, Anthony Flaccavento, Jared Abbott, Kitchen-Table Economics, Rural Investment, Grassroots Organizing, Abolish ICE, ICE Accountability, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, AOC, Ro Khanna, New York City, Immigrant Rights, Civil Liberties, Public Investment This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit egberto.substack.com/subscribe
