 |
Attorney Daniel J. Siegel's Legal Tech PodcastAuthor: Daniel J. Siegel
Law. Technology. Ethics. Techno-Ethics. Productivity. Nowadays lawyers, law firms and legal professionals must address a wide range of issues. It could be cybersecurity and phishing today, and tomorrow it could be the need to train staff on how to use Adobe Acrobat or Microsoft Word. You name it, if it's related to law, tech or ethics, this jargon-free podcast will cover the topic. Plus, Attorney Dan Siegel is a nationally known speaker and writer on law, ethics, and technology - known for his jargon-free approach.Sponsored by Integrated Technology Services, LLC and the Law Offices of Daniel J. Siegel, LLC, experts and practicing lawyers and legal professionals, this podcast will help you learn and keep your practice moving. Language: en-us Genres: Business Contact email: Get it Feed URL: Get it iTunes ID: Get it |
Listen Now...
Vote Smart: Understanding Pennsylvania’s Judicial Retention Elections
Episode 2
Sunday, 26 October, 2025
In this episode, attorney Daniel J. Siegel takes a thoughtful look at Pennsylvania’s upcoming Pennsylvania judicial retention elections—and why voters should look beyond headlines, partisanship, and single-issue politics when deciding whether to retain appellate judges. Drawing on decades of courtroom experience and more than 250 appellate cases, Siegel explains how Pennsylvania’s Supreme, Superior, and Commonwealth Court judges shape the law that affects every citizen, from workers’ compensation to family and criminal cases.Siegel urges voters to focus on fairness, preparation, integrity, and adherence to the rule of law—the qualities that define strong jurists—rather than letting political winds or controversial soundbites determine the future of the judiciary. He also shares why he supports the retention of Justices Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, David Wecht, and Judges Alice Beck Dubow and Michael Wojcik, emphasizing that judicial excellence transcends party lines.If you care about the courts, justice, and democracy, this episode offers a lawyer’s clear, reasoned perspective on how to judge the judges.
