 |
Truth Be FoundAuthor: Justin Yentes
"Truth Be Found" is not your average podcastit's a thrilling journey into the heart of investigation with your host, Justin Yentes. Join Justin as he dives deep into the world of high-stakes investigations, interviewing colleagues and experts who have ventured into the jungles and beyond to discover the truth. From researchers and attorneys to digital forensics experts, Delta Force, and SEAL Team Six, each episode offers a captivating glimpse into the minds of those who seek truth in the most complex cases. Get ready to uncover secrets, explore groundbreaking technologies, and experience the adrenaline-pumping world of investigation with Justin Yentes on "Truth Be Found." Language: en Genres: Documentary, Science, Social Sciences, Society & Culture Contact email: Get it Feed URL: Get it iTunes ID: Get it |
Listen Now...
Use of Force and the Constitution: What the Law Says
Episode 50
Tuesday, 17 March, 2026
Before reacting to a viral clip or choosing a political side, there’s a more important question: what does the law say? Public debates about police use of force often begin with a short video, a headline, or a social media narrative, but the legal standards that govern these moments were defined decades ago by the Supreme Court and they’re far more complex than most public discussions suggest. In this episode, Justin Yentes is joined by self-defense attorney Joey Hamby and former LEO Matt Browning to break down the constitutional framework behind use-of-force cases. They examine the landmark Supreme Court decisions that courts rely on when determining whether force was lawful and how those standards are applied in real-world situations where officers must make split-second decisions. Key Topics: The three main factors courts use when analyzing police use of force How courts evaluate split-second decisions made in dangerous situations Why police training, departmental policy, and institutional accountability matter How media incentives and public outrage can distort complex legal cases Why transparency and fairness are essential to public trust in the justice system This episode is for listeners who want to understand how the law evaluates use-of-force cases, rather than relying on viral clips or political commentary. It may challenge assumptions about how courts view police actions, how civil rights claims work, and why legal standards often look very different from the debates playing out online. Make sure that you follow the show and subscribe to the YouTube channel so you never miss an update! Follow Justin Yentes: @truthbefoundpodcast Link to Justin’s agency, AIA: https://azprivateinvestigator.com/ Follow Matt: https://www.instagram.com/matsonbrowning/ Matt Browning’s book: https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-hate-next-door-undercover-within-the-new-face-of-white-supremacy-matson-browning/964fba3e77e39704?affiliate=1713&ean=9781728276632&next=t&singleFormat=true Joey Hamby, Attorney: https://attorneysforfreedom.com/teammember/joey-hamby/ Graham v. Connor: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/490/386/ Tennessee v. Garner: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/ Statue 42 U.S.C. § 1983 — Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983 Fourteenth Amendment: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/
