![]() |
LexLineAuthor: LexLine
Carlo DAngelo is the host of LexLine (DeFi Media, Inc.). Carlo is also a criminal defense lawyer, former law professor and crypto and NFT enthusiast with 25-plus years of experience defending state and federal crimes. To contact Carlo, visit https://linktr.ee/carlodangelo The views and opinions expressed by guests and speakers on this show do not necessarily reflect those of the hosts or their affiliates. Nothing discussed in these podcasts should be considered legal or financial advice and in no way from an attorney-client relationship. Language: en Contact email: Get it Feed URL: Get it iTunes ID: Get it |
Listen Now...
Episode 193: Tornado Cash Trial Explained | Why This Case Could Redefine Crypto Privacy & Developer Rights
Tuesday, 29 July, 2025
In this episode of LexLine, criminal defense lawyer Carlo D’Angelo—the DeFi Defense Lawyer—dives into one of the most consequential crypto trials in U.S. history: the criminal case against Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm. Broadcasting live from the heart of legal commentary, Carlo breaks down what’s at stake in this Manhattan courtroom battle and why the outcome could radically reshape privacy rights, blockchain development, and free speech protections.What You’ll Learn:What Tornado Cash is and how its mixing technology works on the Ethereum blockchainWhy the DOJ is charging Storm under the unlicensed money transmitter statute (18 U.S.C. 1960)How privacy-preserving tools like mixers, VPNs, and encrypted messaging apps are being scrutinized under federal lawThe implications of the Blanche Memo and FinCEN guidance—and how they could be game-changersWhy prosecuting open-source software could set a dangerous precedent for developers and investorsReal-world consequences: from pig butchering scams to crypto laundering pipelines and how unsuspecting intermediaries are being criminalizedWhy this case might lead to an appeal—and a potential Supreme Court showdownWhy It Matters:If the DOJ secures a conviction, this case could open the floodgates for criminalizing software tools that promote financial privacy—even if misused by bad actors. It’s not just about Tornado Cash—it's about whether code is speech, and who bears responsibility when code is abused.













