 |
Two Brad For YouStories from the world of science Author: Bradley van Paridon
Join science journalist Brad van Paridon as he explores all manner of weird science topics with friends from all walks of life and through discussions with scientists and science journalists. Language: en Genres: News, Science, Tech News Contact email: Get it Feed URL: Get it iTunes ID: Get it |
Listen Now...
Episode 109 - Why Science Needs Emotion
Episode 109
Friday, 6 February, 2026
When you hear the word "science," what do you feel? Bored? Intimidated? In awe? Suspicious? Turns out, that gut reaction matters more than you think — and it might be the key to understanding why science communication so often fails, and why grifters and pseudoscientists are so successful.In this episode I sat down with Daniel Silva Luna, a science communication researcher from Colombia, now based in Germany, whose work focuses on one of the most overlooked forces in how we understand science: emotion. Not just feelings like crying at a nature documentary (though, no shame), but emotion as a navigation tool — the internal compass that shapes what information you trust, what stories you believe, and who you think "science" is even for.We got into some big questions that don't get asked enough. What is science to people who didn't study it? Why do anti-science populist movements communicate so effectively while scientists struggle to be heard? How do tech billionaires like Elon Musk wrap themselves in the legacy of real scientists to build authority — and what can legitimate science communicators learn from that? And why does science communication still feel like a club most people aren't invited to?No lab coat required. Just curiosity.Key TakeawaysEmotions don't distort our relationship with science — they mediate it. There's no emotion-free way to engage with information.Anti-science movements work because they speak to real feelings of exclusion, distrust, and frustration. Debunking alone doesn't address any of that.Science communication's emotional range is too narrow. Wonder and curiosity are great. But anger, sadness, fear, and frustration are also legitimate and powerful — and they're being left on the table.Representation in science communication isn't just a fairness issue. It's a relevance issue.Science communicators should think of their work as storytelling with a point of view, not just information transfer.Ed Yong: Science WriterQueering science communication: Representations, theory, and practiceLab coats in Hollywood: Science, scientists, and cinema - David A. KirbyVarieties of awe in science communication: Reflexive thematic analysis of practitioners’ experiences and uses of this emotion - Daniel Silva LunaEmotion in practice: The cultural work of emotion in science communication - Daniel Silva LunaThis is the only link you need to subscirbe and never miss an episode of Two Brad For You. Please do rate and review it really helps us out.If you'd like to support the show with currency click here. We are grateful for that too. Finally, you can check out the website here.Many thanks to Freak Motif for the music and
